The Winner Is- A Tie Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster.. in two weeks I lost one Seagate Ironwolf and 1 WD Red (3 years old). All of this is a shame, because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the disks could be really useful. So the plan is to buy 2 x NAS grade CMR drives. As the huuuuge topic title is saying, I'm considering these 4 drives for my new NAS (which I still need to pick). I´ve just installed two Seagate Ironwolf 8TB, and I am so dissapointed with these drives. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Aren't the Seagates faster? The IronWolf scored 2,969, where the WD Red 10TB managed 3,011. Inaczej wygląda także sprawa z pamięcią cache, która w wariancie 256 MB dostępna jest w serii Red dopiero w najdroższych, 10 TB dyskach, podczas gdy dla HDD Seagate’a – 7, 8 i 10 TB. Seagate IronWolf (6-12 TB) Seagate IronWolf (4 TB) WD Red (8-12 TB) WD Red (4 TB) 24/7 operation: YES: RPM: 7200: 5900 ~5400: Max sustained data transfer rate: 210 MB/s: 180 MB/s: 210 MB/s: 178 MB/s: Cache: 256 MB: 64 MB: 256 MB: 64 MB: RAID support: All configurations: Enclosure: 1-8 bay: Up to 8-bay or rack mounted: Workload: 180 TB/year: MTBF: 1 million hours: Unrecoverable read … Zobacz inne Dyski twarde, najtańsze i najlepsze oferty, opinie. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. You are using an out of date browser. Wszystko cacy. Stale przesuwamy granice w zakresie pojemności pamięci masowej, zdecydowanie wyprzedzając konkurencję. Rozważam WD Red oraz Toshiba N300. Seagate IronWolf. Does a 2% difference really matter for this use case? Many thanks . Do tej pory wszystkie dyski, które kupowałem to WD Red, nie mam z nimi problemów - ale może czas dać szansę innej firmie? Copyright © 2000-2021 M2N Limited E. & O.E. Very noisy drives - can be heard from the neighbor room. They run a full 6 degrees warmer than my WD Red in idle and know the TS251 warns of too warm drives (S.M.A.R.T). The Seagate IronWolf series is the company's solution for NAS setups, rivaling the Western Digital Red, but with faster speeds and larger storage capacities available. I also ordered 32GB RAM, and a 1TB SSD for the cache drive. I currently have all three running in the same nas (regular red, not pro). Teraz powoli mysle o kolejnym 6 TB ale Seagate, bo tanszy a WD zamiast I have dozens of external drives and am very excited to consolidate all that data into a storage solution with some redundancy. They all have the same warranty and the same/similar features. Fan is running constantly .. Room is only 17 degrees where NAS is stored- Da der Preis ziemlich knapp aneinander ist, spielt dieser bei der Entscheidung keine Rolle. Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited, Join the AVForums team live on Wednesdays at 7pm UK time. See all prices. JavaScript is disabled. In the following section of this review, we will test 8 Seagate IronWolf 12TB HDDs performance in both iSCSI and CIFS configurations inside a Netgear 628x (RAID6). I know I need at least 10TB to start. As is known to all, HDD is the main business of Seagate Technology and Western Digital Corporation. Tak myslę o 4TB lub 6TB w Raid Mirror. The drives are mostly for long-term storage of music, movies and ROMs. My question is: should I buy WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf for the Synology? Prior to commenting on the other possible use-cases, one thing is clear from the above pricing matrix - if you absolutely require 18TB per disk, the WD Gold, WD Red Pro, Seagate IronWolf … Seagate Ironwolf o WD Red ? Ciao a tutti, ... volevo sapere quale HDD sia meglio abbinare tra: Seagate Iron wolf e Western Digital Red come taglio di storage penso di stare o su 4 o su 6tb cadauno ma molto dipenderà anche dal prezzo che troverò in rete. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Now I'm in the process of choosing what drives to fill the 4 x 3.5" bays with. I was originally thinking that a pair of 6TB would be good for what I need the NAS to do, but with the WD SMR/CMR issue, I'm now looking at 8TB drives to eliminate that issue. Turns out shucking WD branded external drives was the most cost effective way to get high-capacity NAS drives. https://www.backblaze.com/b2/hard-drive-test-data.html. I usually buy on price when there's a difference. I am not sure about WD now. Przede wszystkim, dyski Seagate IronWolf są projektowane na większe obciążenie w stosunku do serii WD Red, w przypadku której jest to 120 TB rocznie. I've used WD Red's for like 99% of my units. Is there a contender I missed? WD comes in smaller units which is ideal when your application is on a limited scale. Also: 5200RPM vs 7200RPM does it matter for this basic use case? Price are somewhat the same. Wychodząc naprzeciw wyjątkowym wyzwaniom związanym z rozwojem masowej pamięci danych, firma Seagate® opracowała wiodące w swojej kategorii dyski IronWolf® i IronWolf Pro o pojemności 16 TB do sieciowej pamięci masowej (NAS), aby pomóc Ci w osiąganiu założonych celów. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Is there a contender I missed? For the life of me I cannot find a good empirical reason prefer one brand over another. I'd like to save the money if the difference would be negligible. https://www.extremetech.com/computing/309730-western-digital-comes-clean-shares-which-hard-drives-use-smr. Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. Pro: Alta affidabilità; Ottime prestazioni; Ridotta rumorosità e sviluppo di calore Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. HGST perhaps? Wish I understood their practical implications. who cares if they're under warranty? The price/performance seem to be nearly on par across the board. Based on 1,896 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. Replacing WD RED 3TB with Seagate Ironwolf 4TB Bart. The RED Pro and Ironwolf level drives are also stated to run longer and manage vibration issues etc but how much this is fact vs spin is open to debate. What's the difference between their HDD products? This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives in … Seagate IronWolf, 1 TB, NAS... Seagate IronWolf NAS. I use the WD RED pro in RAID 10 for primary backup and RAID 6 for archive backup and find them very reliable with most failures out of the box or in the first 24 hour burn in period Oct 15, 2018. In the reviews I see lots of anecdotes praising or slagging off one or another brand, but I'm looking for actual data to guide my choice. I'd get wd my book/elements and shuck them, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. IronWolf (Seagate) raczej odrzucam, ze względu na złe doświadczenia z Seagate w przeszłości. company number 03997482, registered in England and Wales. I have a wd red I got a year and a half ago and it is CMR. 1 Home Entertainment Tech Community & Resource. The following will give you a comparison of Seagate vs Western Digital HDD, which introduces the differences on reliability, speed, capacity of the two HDD brands. WD Red. Seagate Ironwolf 4TB not showing Ironwolf Health Dougneedshelp. May 01, 2017. and you DO have a backup....don't you?? W ogole z WD zaskoczyl mnie tylko WD Black 4TB w pececie ktory zlapal skads 4 bad bloki. Podcast: One system for both Hi-Fi & Cinema? I appreciate the numbers. But the storage bandwidth in PCMark 08 of just 15MB/s is well below the 19.3MB/s that the Seagate … I have just built my first NAS from an old computer but need a second disk to get started. Some have failed, those things happen ofcourse. The 7200 rpm drives use more power and the Toshiba's seem to be the loudest if those matter. HGST perhaps? Joined Jan 4, 2007 Messages 1,373 Reaction score 50 Points 51 Location It's going to be your basic SMB / FTP / Plex setup. Seagate IronWolf, WD RED, a może HGST (choć to właściwie teraz chyba WD Dysk twardy Seagate IronWolf 4TB 6Gb/s SATA (ST4000VN008) - od 469,00 zł, porównanie cen w 39 sklepach. Seagate are supposedly readying updated firmware for the disks too. Edit:In the end it wasn't brand that swayed me, it was price. Newegg shows the WD Red 4TB at $209.99 and the Seagate … This website uses the TMDb API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDb. Obviously the main choices are: Can anyone point me towards a demonstrable advantage to one of these choices? The No. For now, we're testing the leading 10TB helium HDDs from HGST and Seagate, and the 8TB WD Gold. - Western Digital Red or Red Pro - Seagate IronWolf - Toshiba N300. But I am thinking about buying a new NAS and I just can't choose which drive. View. Once I have redundant local storage setup, my next project will be tape backup or maybe something like AWS S3 Glacier. Product Comparison: Western Digital Red Pro vs Seagate IronWolf Pro. When you need the massive amount of storage, you can go with Seagate Ironwolf Pro as it has bigger storage capacities up to 12 GB. It is 5.79 x 4 x 1.03 inches and it weighs 1.30 pounds. But will spend what's needed to do it right. Location London ReflexReact Active Member. Haunted NAS Drives keep "disappearing" after a while of being visible?! From a price standpoint, both products are between $210 and $220, depending on your e-tailer preference. With the amount of RAM and SSD based cache you'll be adding it doesn't really matter what HDD you use. There hasn't really been any differences in performance between the 7200 and 5200 rpm drives because of cache and other limits. There is a difference. I have 2 WD Red 4TB, and now I am worried. And they have special software build in. Czy ktoś z Was ma doświadczenia z dyskami Toshiba? WD Red or Seagate IronWolf. Even the author describes the variations described in his Annualized Failure Rate chart as a "... trivial increase .. well within a normal variation.". You must log in or register to reply here. Press J to jump to the feed. Sep 30, 2020. The reality is, other than certain specific models with widespread known issues, You get drives that fail and drives that last until you retire them from all brands. McIntosh MA7200 Review + TV Show & Movie Reviews & News. Should not be very old or having any bad sectors please. It is red and black with the signature hexagon design from WD. Witam Co polecacie do NAS'a w domciu? The dimensions are 5.78 x 4 x 1.03 inches and it weighs 1.34 pounds. Just try to stay away from SMR drives. Pick the drive with the best warranty and go from there. ... Western Digital Red Pro 6TB... WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB. … Europe's busiest forums, with independent news and expert reviews, for TVs, Home Cinema, Hi-Fi, Movies, Gaming, Tech and more. We will be including the following drives as comparables in the NETGEAR 628x configuration: Seagate IronWolf Pro (12TB, 7,200RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) Looking at … Advertiser Disclosure. 26 0 0. Powered by Xenforo, Hosted by Nimbus Hosting, Original design Critical Media Ltd. Seagate ironwolf vs ironwolf pro SD. Given all the great advice you have given over the years, I am about to buy my first "real" NAS, the Synology DS220+. W poprzednim Zyxelu mialem (a wlasciwie to mam ale nie uzywam) inny WD Red 2 TB i tez zawsze pieknie. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. The price/performance seem to be nearly on par across the board. I compared some costs via http://diskprices.com/. I have already bought two, but I may buy another after confirming that my PC supports more than two disks. Can anyone point me towards a demonstrable advantage to one of these choices? in two weeks I lost one Seagate Ironwolf and 1 WD Red (3 years old). Check the product nu.bers against the list of smr drives they posted. £47.81. WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. There really isn't a reason to pick one over the others. Rating - 100%. As you can see, WD Red is available up to 8 GB, whereas Seagate Ironwolf Pro provides up to 12 GB of storage. That and the Ironwolf range are £30-£50 cheaper than the respective Western Digital Red and Red … Welcome to your friendly /r/homelab, where techies and sysadmin from everywhere are welcome to share their labs, projects, builds, etc. X. W Zyxelu mam pojedynczy WD Red 6 TB, juz chyba ze 2 lata bedzie. Amazon. If anyone has a 4/6/8 TB WD Red (CMR version) or Seagate Ironwolf NAS HDD that they want to get rid of then please let me know. WD Red Pro : The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. The hard drive is green, black, and red with the striking IronWolf logo in the middle. I got a HPE ProLiant Microserver Gen10 AMD x3421 cheap on ebay. I am so stoked to be building my 1st NAS.

Come Vedere Video Tiktok, Legge Sulle Verifiche Scolastiche, Tfa Sostegno Arezzo 2020, Isee 2021 Online, Quale Dei Seguenti Strumenti Non è Specifico Per L'interazione, Vasco Rossi - Gli Angeli Accordi, Concorde Aereo Costo Biglietto, Quaderno Di Storia Classe Terza, Tabella Di Rivalutazione Della Lira Dal 1861 Al 2017, Vendita Case Genova Castelletto Terrazzo,