Share your experiences and opinions with the best of the Western Digital hard drives with us through the comments section here below. First off, we just want to say thanks for considering Seagate, regardless of which route you decide is the best fit for your needs in the end. The hard drive offers you both low-level usage and long life functionality. We hope, this comparison will help you to choose the right product for you according to your application and requirements. The 2TB version of WD's Red NAS range of hard drives has a performance profile that is similar to that of its larger 3TB sibling. The Seagate IronWolf series is the company's solution for NAS setups, rivaling the Western Digital Red, but with faster speeds and larger storage capacities available. Red Pros are probably not worth the extra $ for home use. The tabulated comparison between the two hard drive types will ensure that we will be able to understand the exact features that each of these options offers you. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. The IronWolf NAS models deliver slightly better performance compared to the WD Red due to the 7200RPM nature, but, have correspondingly higher power consumption numbers. The buffer cache merely is an embedded memory that keeps the hard disk and the computer system in the buffer. Since Seagate is more performance and speeds intensive, its temperature varies between 41F to 158F while in operation. The hard drive may not be a good option if you are dealing with a RAID environment. We are here to give you good advise. I've been buying drives for over 30 years. What benefits does the integration have? Rating - … Our Verdict. WD Blue is one of the most commonly used hard drives from Western Digital. That 9 day and almost 14-hour rebuild means that using the WD Red 4TB SMR drive inadvertently in an array would lead to your data being vulnerable for around 9 days longer than the WD Red 4TB CMR drive or Seagate IronWolf. Yeah tried that. Late 1990s - expensive high-end Dell Workstation and 9GB SCSI drive; making a lovely SCSI hard drive sound which was rather nice sounding. Not sure what the issue is it just says smart status failing. It is obvious, whenever we talk about storage drives, Seagate and Western Digital are the only names that are much likely come up. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. I deploy nothing but Seagate Iron Wolf and am glad for the integration Synology has with those drives. They both good choices for a NAS, however I personally prefer WD Red… Something happened to the batch and there was a30% failure rate per year on that one batch of drives. I'm considering the ds416j for ease of use and found it online at warehouse 1 – cost with 4 x 3tb wd red is $1025. Since you have landed on this page, we assume that you are looking for the best NAS storage solution based on its quality and durability. Got two failures right off the bat. Before we dig into a WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf product comparison, we will discuss some of its use cases. Western Digital 4TB WD Red Plus NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 64 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD40EFRX Seagate BarraCuda 2TB Internal Hard Drive HDD – 2.5 Inch SATA … Thus, Seagate is a winner once again here. The discs have been planned to offer a streamlined mix of high capacity, faster speeds in terms of sequential read and write operations. Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. The slack employee who sneezed too often has moved to another job. Copyright All rights reserved, Best NAS Storage Drive: WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf Spec Comparison, on Best NAS Storage Drive: WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf Spec Comparison, WD SE vs WD Red Pro Specifications Comparison, WD Red vs WD Gold vs WD SE Enterprise NAS Storage, List of the Best Budget Laptops with Intel Core™ i5-10210U Processor, Xiaomi Amazfit T Rex vs GTR vs Stratos 3 – Specs Comparison, Budget LGA 1200 Motherboards – Intel Z490 for Core i5 10600K 10500K, Fix and Resolve Error Band is paired by other person Ask them to unpair it and try again, How to Connect Pair and Reset MI Band 2 In Android, How to Connect Your Jiofi Device To PC Using Through USB Tethering, How to Configure Yahoo Mail in Microsoft Outlook 2016, Best Budget B550 Motherboards For Ryzen 2 CPUs – 3600XT 3800XT, 3 years of limited warranty from the manufacturer, 6.4/5.2 (8TB), 5.3/3.4 (6TB, 5TB), 4.5/3.3 (4TB), 4.1/2.7 (3TB, 2TB), 3.3/2.3 (1TB), 1.4/0.6 (1TB 2.5”, 750GB 2.5”), 5.3/3.4 (6TB, 5TB, 4TB), 4.1/3.0 (3TB, 2TB), 3.3/2.5 (1TB @5400RPM), 6.8/6.1 (, Designed for use in a NAS system supporting up to 8 bays/storage drives at once, 24×7 availability, NAS firmware compatibility, ideal for 24×7 working environments, Does not need / ships with mounting hardware, if the NAS system requires a mounting device, they are available for purchase separately, Delivers fantastic compatibility and performance with NAS-ware 3.0, Remains cool in most of the situations, sturdy build with vibration proof protection, On drive balance with agile array technology, power management with NAS enclosure, error data recovery control, RAID optimization, Compatible with NAS systems with 1 to 16 bays, rotational vibration sensors, consistent performance in multi-bay NAS systems with mitigating vibration, Up to 12 TB of storage with 300 TB / year workload capacity, ideal for multi-user access/environment, 2 million hours MTBF. If the hard drive you choose tends to buckle under such loads, you may end up with huge performance issues. However, this does not mean that Western Digital Red is a bad NAS storage, not at all. Hey OP. When you pair IronWolf and 4TB+ capacities of IronWolf & IronWolf Pro, you get an extra baked in drive monitoring feature that extends beyond traditional S.M.A.R.T monitoring, dubbed IHM (IronWolf Health Management). Have a look here: Let us quickly summarize what the table represents: The form factor of both drives is same that is 3.5” x 1/3H, and both of them are designed for network attached storages, making them a good alternative to each other. In the case of these products, WD comes with three years of limited warranty. What is the best drive to get? Today, we will attempt understanding the differences between the WD Blue and WD Red and check the specifications that they come with. WD Red drives are one of the best options for all your specific requirements concerning high-end applications. Since they were established, both Western Digital and Seagate have built trust among the consumers with their best quality products and excellent service and support. ive seen more reds fail then wolfs but others will say different. Moreover, WD red has 64 MB of buffer cache where Ironwolf Pro has 256 MB of the buffer cache. And they run significantly hotter than 5200/5900rpm drives. Both use sub-branding for their product offerings, and they are as follows: To make things easier for our readers, we will begin with a side by side comparison, and then discuss what the various advantages (or disadvantages) of these drives are. These drives come with 3D Active Balance Plus which lets you use up to eight WD Red drives in a NAS enabled system. Now I'm looking to buy a new 4TB hdd and … WD RED is specifically designed hard drive option for the NAS server applications. As you can see, WD Red is available up to 8 GB, whereas Seagate Ironwolf Pro provides up to 12 GB of storage. Based on pure specs, simply put, Seagate Ironwolf Pro outlasts Western Digital Red in every possible aspect when it comes to speed and performance. And Maxtor. The hard drives have been made specifically for this purpose. Consistently quieter in operation and affordable at best, they are an excellent option for your home based low level needs like basic browsing and similar other options. The exact requirements that you have should dictate the exact choice of the hard drives you will go with. IronWolf drives >= 8TB are 7200rpm. Here we begin: Following table summarizes all important specs and aspect about the Seagate Ironwolf Pro and Western Digital Red. It is quite considerable as it delivers better performance compared to the former one. It is simple. The difference is clear, isn’t it? WD Red Vs. Seagate Ironwolf? When in use, the temperature of WD Red sits between 32F to 149F. Run RAID. Today, we will be discussing two NAS hard disk drives from the world’s leading storage solution providers: Western Digital and Seagate. IBM. That was all we have concerning the comparison between the WD Red and WD Blue hard drives and their specific application areas. Every vendor has good runs and bad runs. Thus, we have picked the best NAS hard drive storage solution provided by these two brands. Western Digital has been one of the most popular manufacturers of Hard Drives and SSDs. From among a host of options that Western Digital offers you, it may be a little difficult to understand the exact difference between the differences between each of these options. Been through more drives, and more vendors, than I can remember. Worth every extra penny that they cost. You can't beat that drive. I had one go bad in 5 years, simply stuck my spare in m NAS and did an RMA - now that one sits as my spare. These drives are not for general purpose storage. I recently had a 4TB IronWolf totally die within a few weeks of commisioning, and it was replaced by the store. The WD40EFAX is the only SMR drive in the comparison and is the focus of the testing. Let us check out which purposes do the WD RED, and WD Blue hard drives serve? Western Digital 1TB WD Red Plus NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 16 MB Cache, 2.5" - WD10JFCX 4.7 out of 5 stars 395 WD 10TB Elements Desktop Hard Drive HDD, … The drive has Helium, and this ensures that it causes less turbulence and resistance. They can also be a good option for the basic level of media consumption. It can be one of the best options for the non-mission critical PC functions. As the table above shows, MTBF for WD Red is 1000000 hours, and for Ironwolf Pro, it is 1200000 hours. volevo sapere quale HDD sia meglio abbinare tra: Seagate Iron wolf e Western Digital Red come taglio di storage penso di stare o su 4 o su 6tb cadauno ma molto dipenderà anche dal … Western Digital has been attempting to merge both the Green and Blue range of hard drives into a single Blue range of hard drives. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. WD Blue is the hard drive from the Western Digital stable that caters mostly to the home users. Not sure what the issue is it just says smart status failing. Go figure. Mainly, NAS storage is used where you need to serve files to various users over SMB 3.0 or a web user interface. The discs are made available in capacities up to 8 TB. While Seagate Ironwolf Pro is already in the lead, it comes with free data recovery software, giving it even further edge. Advertiser Disclosure. On and on. We will compare the two hard drive types based on a few key parameters –. The higher end SATA DAS/NAS storage segments have been served by 4 TB models for … If you use WD Red CMR drives, you had class-leading performance in this test but if you bought a WD Red … The side by side comparison between the two hard drive types will help us pinpoint the differences between the two options. 10 ^ 15 is higher than 10 ^ 14. J. Jacob Weinstein @jacobweins. The IronWolf base model competes head to head with Western Digital's Red (base series) that still uses the 5,900-RPM spindle speed. Most … Shock tolerance while operating and while the ideal is nearly similar for both of the hard disk drives. A year where (almost) everything is perfect, then a year with a 3+% return rate under warranty. That would mean it should be up to you as to which among them would you want to go with. … The IronWolf Pro is the direct competitor to the Red … I ended up opting to still go for the red as evidently media streaming doesn’t benefit from 7200, but it will chew up more power! Testing the WD Red … Se il tuo scopo fosse la velocità delle operazioni di I/O o di caricamento del sistema operativo, potresti rivolgerti ad un hard disk SSD oggi presenti sul mercato. Most people stick to the brand they started out with unless they've had massive problems. Hard disk drives meant for NAS storage are different from traditional hard disk drives in many ways. Le prestazioni sono infatti di ottimo livello se comparate ad altri modelli del settore NAS, come i WD Red… Hitachi. While sustaining itself in the market with several options, the company has been a good choice for computer storages since the 1970s. Wanted WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf NAS HDD. You will also find that they are the most affordable options for your requirement. But Ironwolf is a newer drive that doesn't have the issues more than any other drive model. Seagate Technology | Official Forums Team. WD Red is built for limited scale application where Ironwolf Pro is developed for large-scale applications with high performance and speed. When you need the massive amount of storage, you can go with Seagate Ironwolf Pro as it has bigger storage capacities up to 12 GB. Sound emission for WD Red is 23 dBA. If you’re looking at a larger drive, you might be interested that the Wolf offers 7200RPM at 6tb and higher, whereas you have to get the Red Pro for that in the WD range. It’s whisper quiet and the shock protection is great too, There is plenty of information about the temperature and load averages, The hard drive comes with an authentication code, There has been a … edit: Get whichever of those two drives, the WD Red or Seagate IronWolf, is cheapest. 70+ WD 5400rpm Reds in production 24/7 and we've had 1 failure in 3 years. I remember when Seagate was bad. When it comes to internal data rate, Seagate Ironwolf Pro as 210 MB/s speed where WD Red has 147 MB/s. Congratulations, as you have fallen in just the right spot. Apr 03, 2019 2 Replies 4083 Views 1 Likes. Which among those had drive types have you opted for? Affiliate Disclosure: is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Yeah, back into the early 80s. WD comes in smaller units which is ideal when your application is on a limited scale. This server is connected to a network that allows multiple levels of user access to the data that is stored on NAS simultaneously using the network layer. Conventional drives are made for personal use where only one user accesses it at a time, whereas NAS storage drives are more capable as they handle entire group or groups of users at the same time. Moreover, their service includes free data recovery meaning that you would not need to pay for data recovery if anything goes wrong with the drive. five years of warranty includes data recovery plans free for three years, Tough and scalable for NAS. Here is how: WD Red has the spindle speed of … Like it has already made clear through the above discussion, the WD Red hard drives have been considered to be an excellent option for the NAS environments. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. Backup, archiving and disaster recovery functions, Compatible with on-premise private cloud and virtual storage. X. Affordability is one of the areas that has made it a preferred alternative among a host of other service providers. Moreover, the nonrecoverable errors occur once per 10 ^ 14 errors in WD Red, and for Seagate Ironwolf Pro it happens once for 10 ^ 15. Based on pure specs, simply put, Seagate Ironwolf Pro outlasts Western Digital Red in every possible aspect when it comes to speed and performance. We are passionate Tech Bloggers from the Industry with years of consulting experience. The funny thing, by the time the statistics are gathered and analyzed, you are one or two years down the line, and you are onto a new run. This will translate into lesser power draw and less heat. You will also find less chance of getting a refurb, like you would with a WD Red. Furthermore, while we don’t yet have Seagate’s IronWolf 110 NAS SSD, if you compare the two, WD’s Red SA500 is significantly less expensive, but then again, the Red doesn’t offer the … Western Digital achieved parity with the launch of the second generation WD Red models yesterday. So I have a drive failing, it is a WD Red. Syquest. One of the most cost-effective and budget drives coming from WD, the drive suits all your basic requirements. The same thing has happened with WD … Storage Management WD Red Vs. Seagate Ironwolf? So, now that you understand exactly how these NAS drives differ from traditional hard drives let us jump to the main topic of the discussion. Samsung. Western Digital, commonly referred to as WD has been a well known hard drive manufacturer (they are also into SSDs) and incidentally one of the preferred options leaving aside Seagate. I spent a fair bit of time debating between the two and there were very limited differences, so I ended up with the Red. These drives come with a three-year warranty as opposed to the two-year warranty on the WD Blue hard drives.